Because I don't consider anybody needs a GB whenever they can go DIRECT.
GB, on the other side, is helpful when a shop doesn't ship overseas.
If someone can get their copy via GB, can order in the same way DIRECT, without paying any extra PayPal or HDN fees
(which I understand that they are necessary to run the site, but they are OPTIONAL for those who decides to join or not to the GB)
My critic is not about HDN specifically. Is about what many GB can harm the market.
The more GB, more potential demand (in advance), for the same limited supply =
more money asked for the same edition.
Even when the retail ask for THE SAME price, buyers, GB runners, and scalpers, will end up paying more and more, over the time.
And that turns out into some admins are asking for more copies than asked in the GB, to resell them in eBay for x2 or x3 prices to "cover" their activities as administrators of GB.
And THIS is what it is not fair. Because MANY people asked or pretended to buy a LIMITED EDITION, when others have privileges.
Do you have to run a GB to have privileges in the collecting world to get more edition than others to put them on sale? To ask for x2 or x3 prices?
I'd better step off than feed that business, but criticizing this fact because I consider it abusive practices.
In addition, just because somebody wants to get money back to cover their "giveaways" or "their services", I don't have to participate to raise their funds.
That's why I don't run a GB (when can go direct), and I don't join to any GB (when can go DIRECT, again), neither I join ANY past giveaways (since I expose my opinion).
The main problem is the GB itself, which can ask the retailer for as many editions as the ADMIN can ask. The business is the business, and I respect and understand this matter.
But when that business leaves others
without any option to go
DIRECT (because they sold-out already the edition), impose the "join to our GB, and secure your copy, otherwise you will trouble or have to pay eBay prices" is not a fair game.
Manipulation of the market, taking all the available supply to resell later (whoever do it) and scalping with their editions.
THAT makes the market CORRUPT.
If you offer a giveaway, you don't have the right to take the chances to buy an edition of the other.
That would be stealing the spot of others, indirectly.
And that's what I critic.
But, again, it's my opinion.
And the only person I consider he has spoken respectfully, fully understandable, and clear, is
@SteelCollz
Thanks.
On another note, you have a strong dislike for members clogging up threads with GIFs/memes but apparently it's ok for you to constantly b!tch/moan (and actually derail threads further) about the same old scalpers/eBay talk blah blah 
Yes, we get it, you've made your stance on that subject more than clear yet you're insistent on chanting the same old thing over and over and over... 
I'm not surprised some folks respond to you the way they do as often a wisely chosen GIF can speak louder than any words can. Just for arguments sake, this pretty much sums up how I feel right now after reading your plethora of essays... 
